Portsmouth in Numbers

I live in Portsmouth

Find your ward, your constituency and what the data says about your part of the city.

I want to understand an issue

Eight issues, each with the evidence, the scale, the trend and what is being done.

I need to contact or challenge someone

Find who actually holds the power over an issue — it is often not the council.

Is Portsmouth getting better?

Mixed — and the measures moving fastest in the wrong direction get the least attention. Every tile links to the evidence behind it: what is driving the number, what has been tried, what worked, and what it would cost to do something different.

7 worsening7 improving9 no direction

Housing

Education

Worsening
3.55%

Pupils missing half or more of school, vs Southampton and England

Severe school absence is still rising

England 2.39%

1.69% in 2018/19 — more than doubled

Measure
Pupils missing 50%+ of sessions
Area
Portsmouth state-funded schools
Period
2024/25 · Department for Education
Absence trends, causes and the EBSA evidence gap
Improving
42.9%

EHC plans issued inside the 20-week legal deadline

EHC plan timeliness has recovered sharply

England 45.5% — now almost level

Fell to 1.6% in 2023 from 97% in 2021

Measure
New EHC plans issued within 20 weeks
Area
Portsmouth local authority
Period
Calendar 2025 · Department for Education
The 2023 collapse, the recovery, and what is unexplained
Worsening
35.2%

Pupils passing English and maths GCSE at grade 5+, vs Southampton and England

Barely a third of pupils get a strong pass in English and maths

England reached 45.4% and Southampton 38.9%, so Portsmouth trails its closest comparable city by 3.7 percentage points.

The rate was 34.4% in 2023/24 and 31.6% in 2022/23, so it is recovering slowly from a sharp fall.

Measure
Pupils achieving grade 5 or above in both English and maths GCSE
Area
Portsmouth state-funded schools
Period
2024/25 · DfE
Full GCSE series, cohort sizes and the Southampton gap
Rising
7.17%

Share of Portsmouth pupils holding an EHC plan, vs Southampton and England

One pupil in fourteen now has an EHC plan

Southampton is at 6.72% and England at 6.04%. Portsmouth sat below Southampton for six years and overtook it this year.

The rate was 3.64% in 2018/19, so it has almost doubled in seven years.

Measure
Pupils on a school roll holding an Education, Health and Care plan
Area
Portsmouth schools, all types
Period
January 2026 school census · DfE
What a rising EHCP rate does and does not tell you

Skills

Environment

Health

Jobs & pay

Transport

Council

Governance

Community safety

High streets

Economy

How these were chosen, and what is missing

These are indicators that are genuinely measured, comparable over time, and have an honest direction of travel. Population is deliberately excluded — a rising or falling population is not "better" or "worse". Where a measure has no meaningful good/bad direction, none is shown. Several important domains are not yet represented here because the underlying research is incomplete: temporary accommodation and homelessness, and household-level cost-of-living measures such as fuel poverty and food insecurity.

Portsmouth against the rest of Hampshire

All statistics in full

Nine headline measures, each ranked against the other twelve Hampshire authorities. The bar shows where Portsmouth sits; open a card for the full series, the sources and the comparison with England.

Go deeper

What residents told University of Portsmouth researchers

What kind of evidence this is

Qualitative community-based study — one-to-one conversations plus a single group event. 24 contributors in total (18 one-to-one, 6 at a group event), recruited through community organisations — self-selected, and the report makes no claim to be representative of Portsmouth. It contains no survey percentages, so nothing below is a population estimate: these are themes from what a small number of residents described.

Booking a GP appointment was itself described as the barrier, ahead of the appointment

Participants described barriers at the point of booking — being required to use an online form or to telephone at a fixed time — and reported that all booking routes were impractical for people who work, lack internet access or confidence, or lack the physical dexterity to use a phone.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.6

Some participants had stopped seeking primary care altogether, and presented later in emergency settings

The report states that many people have given up trying to seek help and either hoped they got better or accessed emergency services once seriously unwell, and links this to pressure on Emergency Departments and Urgent Treatment Centres.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.57

Digital-by-default access was the single barrier that recurred across every service area

The report's first key recommendation is that reliance on telephones and the internet acts as a barrier to healthcare, housing and education alike, and that alternatives must be made available rather than assumed away.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.59

Where mental health support was obtained, participants described it being withdrawn rather than tapered

Mental health services were reported as not always accessible, with no clarity about who could refer someone, and support that was often withdrawn once gained.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.57

NHS dental care was described as closed to some participants entirely — not merely delayed

Dental care was reported as not accessible for all, with some participants unable to join a patient list at all and others facing delays and cancellations.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.58

Community groups and centres were the one part of the system participants consistently valued

Support groups, community centres, churches and similar spaces were valued and described as an alternative route to mental wellbeing, but were seen as under-funded and hard to sustain, and public transport limited who could reach them.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.58

Qualifying for social housing required meeting several categories of need at once, and applying online

To access housing, individuals needed to use online platforms and email; the report states there is a lack of appropriate social housing in the city and that families must comply with multiple categories of need to qualify.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.58

Condition and suitability, not only supply — private landlords not acting, and a shortage of wheelchair-accessible stock

The report states that landlords do not always take the necessary action to keep privately rented housing in an appropriate state, that shared accommodation affected mental health and wellbeing, and that stock suitable for wheelchair users was not considered adequate.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.58

The 16–18 transition from school to college was the weakest point described in education

For older children moving from secondary school to college, the report identifies poor information about local provision, the cost of travelling to college, and — for young people with learning disabilities — safety concerns when attending college only a few hours per week, which in turn constrained parents' ability to work.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.58

Named incidental costs — holiday clubs and school trips — were described as decisive for lower-income parents

Financial concerns affected working parents and adults seeking education, specifically the cost of holiday clubs and of school trips; the report recommends considering how lower-income parents might be supported to pay for both.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.58

Participants wanted to work; the barriers they named were employer understanding, transport and inflexible roles

The report states that participants believed there is a lack of understanding and indeed discrimination among employers regarding disabilities, that local transport options did not support travel to work, and that despite these challenges people did want to work in ways accessible to them. Gaps in a CV or overseas employment history were also described as barriers.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.58

For children with SEND, services were described as disconnected, with families passed between teams

The report identifies a further area beyond its original five: health and education for children with special educational needs or disabilities. Services were described as disconnected, with children passed from one team to another; it calls for joined-up working and a single point of access, and notes inconsistent support between schools and inconsistent application of EHCPs.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.59

Portsmouth research

Published research about Portsmouth from the University of Portsmouth and peer-reviewed journals, covering healthcare access, young people's mental health, housing, coastal flood risk and the local energy transition.

This section is research and analysis, not official statistics. It is included to show the range of work that exists on a question — including proposals and hypotheses — not to establish what is true. Items marked as working papers, preprints or institutional reports have not been peer-reviewed. Where an official statistic exists on the same question, that statistic is what this site treats as the fact.

Institutional report — not peer-reviewed2024· University of Portsmouth (Institute of Life Sciences and Healthcare), commissioned by and published by Healthwatch Portsmouth· Portsmouth (PO1–PO6)

The Challenges Facing Portsmouth Residents: A Community-based Research Study

Jennifer Karen Roddis, Nuno Tavares, Elizabeth Anne Roffe

A qualitative study in which 18 residents of PO1–PO6, plus six people who work with residents of deprived areas, described the barriers they meet in healthcare, housing, education, employment and community support — and proposed their own solutions.

Since publication: Two things, both checked on 28 August 2026. First, the deprivation framing in its background section rests on the English Indices of Deprivation 2019, which was superseded by IoD2025 on 30 October 2025 — so the "15 of 115 areas in the lowest decile" line it quotes is out of date and must be re-derived. Second, the same team ran a follow-on project, "Addressing challenges to accessing mental health and dementia support for Portsmouth residents through co-design of patient pathways" (University of Portsmouth with Healthwatch Portsmouth and Bournemouth University, 23 August 2024 to 22 August 2025), whose Portal record was marked finished but listed no published outputs, so the co-designed pathways it produced are not yet citable.

The University of Portsmouth Research Portal record is public, but the Portal's own PDF endpoint returns HTTP 403 behind an interactive Cloudflare bot check. The `pdfUrl` above is the publisher-side copy in the national Healthwatch reports library, which serves the identical 870KB, 62-page document over HTTP 200. Findings from this report are shown separately below, each with its sample size attached.

Peer-reviewed2025· University of Portsmouth — Centre for Integrated Health and Wellbeing· United Kingdom — by a Portsmouth research group, but the paper does not state that its eight participants live in Portsmouth, so it is not evidence about this city specifically

The GP's a stranger: an interpretive phenomenological analysis exploring patient experiences of changed access to primary care in the management of long-term conditions

Sandra Walker, Tansy Daniel, Mediha Yildizcan, Jennifer Karen Roddis

Eight people living with long-term physical or mental health conditions described a primary care system in which they no longer have a relationship with any one clinician — the paper's organising theme, "the GP's a stranger" — and the effect that has on whether they trust and act on the advice they are given.

Since publication: Nothing material on the record itself: checked 28 August 2026, the open-access Frontiers article page resolves and carries no correction or retraction, and the Portal lists no successor paper from this team. What has changed is around it — NHS primary care access arrangements have continued to move since the interviews were conducted, so this is evidence about how patients experienced a changing system, not a description of how booking works in Portsmouth today.

Open access (CC BY). Listed here because it is the closest peer-reviewed work by the same Portsmouth group to the primary-care access theme that dominates the Challenges report — not as a Portsmouth measurement.

Peer-reviewed2023· Solent NHS Trust — Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, Portsmouth· Portsmouth

The viability of a proposed psychoeducational neurodiversity approach in children services: The PANDA (the Portsmouth alliance's neuro-diversity approach)

Zach D. Dunn, Asha Gowda, Isobel C. Horsfall Turner

A feasibility study of the Portsmouth Alliance Neuro-Diversity Approach, a co-produced alternative to a binary diagnostic pathway, in which 51 young people, parents and professionals took part; the authors report a significant improvement in children's wellbeing but not in symptom management, and describe the study as limited in scope.

Since publication: The paper is explicitly a feasibility study and its authors call for further work on the approach; the Crossref record for the DOI, checked 28 August 2026, carries no correction, retraction or update notice. Whether the Portsmouth Alliance still runs the PANDA in the form described is a question for the Alliance, not something that can be inferred from a 2023 feasibility paper.

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 29(1), pp.198–212. SAGE returns HTTP 403 to automated clients, so the full text was NOT read in this session; title, authors, affiliations, pagination and the complete abstract were verified through the Crossref API. Nothing is claimed here beyond what that abstract states. Not a University of Portsmouth output — it is a Solent NHS Trust study, included because it is real, in-window and specifically about this city.

Institutional report — not peer-reviewed2024· Coastal Partners (Portsmouth) with Royal HaskoningDHV· Portsmouth

Protecting Portsmouth: The UK's Island City

A. Prior, C. Toovey, L. A. Sheffield, M. L. Bryan

A conference paper on protecting Portsmouth as an island city, presented by the Coastal Partners team responsible for delivering the city's coastal defences and published in the ICE Coasts, Marine Structures and Breakwaters 2023 proceedings.

Since publication: The paper was given at a conference held in 2023 and published in January 2024. Portsmouth's coastal defence programme is delivered in phases and continues to move, so this should be read as the delivery body's account of the programme at that time; Coastal Partners' current published position is the place to check the scheme's present state, not this paper.

METADATA ONLY — the full text was NOT read. The DOI resolves to Emerald's ICE proceedings platform, which returns HTTP 403 to automated clients. Title, authors, affiliations, venue and pagination (pp.19–37) were verified through the Crossref API. `status` is recorded conservatively as institutional_report because ResearchStatus has no "conference paper" member; the true form is a paper in the ICE Coasts, Marine Structures and Breakwaters 2023 proceedings. The summary above deliberately claims nothing about its findings.

Institutional report — not peer-reviewed2021· University of Portsmouth — School of Civil Engineering & Surveying· Portsmouth Harbour

Field investigation and numerical modelling of drainage systems in coastal regions

Steve Mitchell, Oluwatosin Abdulfatai Onabule

Using field data from Portsmouth Harbour with a numerical model, the authors show how land drainage outlets carve and maintain channels through the harbour's intertidal mudflats and export sediment and water into it — and that flap gates increase that export sharply on spring tides and under high freshwater flows.

Since publication: Nothing material found on the record: the Portal entry, checked 28 August 2026, shows no later version or corrigendum. Two caveats matter more than that. It sits at the very edge of the five-year empirical window and will need a staleness flag from 2027. And its Portsmouth Harbour field campaign predates the later phases of the city's coastal defence works, so its measurements describe the harbour as it was observed, not necessarily as it now drains.

Conditions have moved on — Published 2021, at the outer edge of the five-year empirical window and outside it from 2027. The field campaign predates the coastal defence works completed in Portsmouth since, so its measured drainage behaviour describes the system as it was, not as built today. Use the method and the modelling approach; do not read its measurements as current conditions.

Published in "Towards a Sustainable Water Future" (ICE Publishing), pp.371–382. `status` is recorded conservatively as institutional_report because the Portal classifies it "Conference contribution" WITHOUT a peer-review tag, and ResearchStatus has no "conference paper" member. Abstract read in full from the Portal record.

Institutional report — not peer-reviewed2017· Project Compass CIC, with the University of Portsmouth research record· Portsmouth — Southsea frontage and Common

Portsmouth the island city: building better flood resilience for Southsea's frontage + common: for a more sustainable Portsmouth

Walter Menteth

A 44-page report from the international Portsmouth Elephant Cage design research programme (2016–17), which evaluated the sea defence proposals then on the table for the Southsea frontage, set out an alternative design intended to add amenity and ecological value to Southsea Common, and recommended actions to address what it argued were shortfalls in the existing proposals.

Since publication: This is a 2017 critique of the sea defence proposals as they stood in 2017. The scheme has moved on since, so nothing in it should be read as a description of what is currently proposed or built along the Southsea frontage — check Coastal Partners' current published scheme for that. What remains usable is the argument about how design options for a coastal city get narrowed early, which is a mechanism claim rather than a dated fact.

ISBN 978-0-9931481-3-2, published in London by Project Compass CIC; the Portal marks it externally published. Portal record and full abstract read; the 24.9MB PDF sits on the Portal's Cloudflare-protected /files/ tree and was not retrieved.

Peer-reviewed2018· Walter Menteth Architects / Project Compass CIC, with the University of Portsmouth research record· Portsmouth (Southsea) and Cork, Ireland

Coastal flood resilience: delivering thriving waterfront cities

Walter Menteth

Argues that resilient design for coastal cities is constrained less by engineering than by process — narrow remits, bureaucratic momentum and the inability to iterate publicly — using Portsmouth's Southsea frontage proposals and the comparable situation in Cork as its two cases.

Since publication: The Southsea and Cork proposals it compares were live proposals at the time of writing and both cities' schemes have since progressed, so the chapter is no longer a description of either scheme. Its value now is the process argument, which is why it is filed as a mechanism rather than an empirical source.

Chapter 10, pp.80–85, of "The Cork Papers: Sustainable City in the Making" (ed. Angela Brady), Cork City Council, CC BY-NC. This is the only chapter or proceedings item in this module that the Portal explicitly tags "Chapter (peer-reviewed) › peer-review", which is why it alone carries peer_reviewed status.

Thesis2016· University of Portsmouth — School of Civil Engineering & Surveying· Portsmouth — Hilsea, Eastney and St Thomas wards

Portsmouth Coastal Flood Vulnerability and Risk: assessment and mapping of impacts at microscale

Sarah Percival

Develops a coastal flood vulnerability and risk method that works at Output Area level and distinguishes daytime from night-time exposure, and applies it to three Portsmouth wards — Hilsea, Eastney and St Thomas — finding that the extra resolution identifies neighbourhoods a coarser assessment misses.

Since publication: Its population inputs are the 2011 Census, which the 2021 Census has replaced, and its defence assumptions predate the current Portsmouth coastal defence programme. The specific ward and neighbourhood risk rankings should therefore not be quoted as current risk for anywhere in the city; what survives is the microscale, day/night method and the general point that ward-level averages hide the neighbourhoods that matter.

Conditions have moved on — Population and household inputs are 2011 Census, superseded by the 2021 Census; hazard assumptions predate the current coastal defence programme. Use the METHOD, not the 2016 risk maps or the named at-risk neighbourhoods.

Doctoral thesis, awarded June 2016, supervised by Richard Teeuw and Andy Gale. Portal record and full abstract read; the 25.6MB thesis PDF sits on the Portal's Cloudflare-protected /files/ tree and was not retrieved. Categorised as `mechanism` because what this module would use is its method — the empirical risk maps inside it are older than the empirical window and the staleness flag above says so explicitly.

Institutional report — not peer-reviewed2025· University of Portsmouth — School of Energy and Electronic Engineering, with University of Chichester and University of Wollongong in Dubai· Portsmouth

Seasonal dynamics of green hydrogen supply and demand: a spatio temporal study of freight transport in Portsmouth City UK

Oghenovo Okpako, Imran Usman Sumda, Kelvin Anoh, Haile Selassie Rajamani

A 2050 scenario study which sites offshore wind and hydrogen production for Portsmouth using GIS, simulates seasonal supply against the city's road-freight demand, finds a seasonal mismatch between the two, and proposes a dynamic pricing model to shift consumption into surplus periods.

Since publication: Nothing material found: the Portal record, checked 28 August 2026, lists no later version and the DOI resolves. The far more important caveat is what the paper is — a modelled 2050 scenario built on assumed offshore wind resource and assumed freight demand, whose pricing proposal is an output of the model. It is not an observed Portsmouth hydrogen price and must never be rendered as one.

IEEE SEGE 2025 proceedings, pp.275–281. Abstract read in full from the Portal record; the IEEE Xplore full text is paywalled. `status` is recorded conservatively as institutional_report because the Portal classifies it "Conference contribution" without a peer-review tag. Filed under `energy_cost_modelling` deliberately — it proposes a pricing model, so it is exactly the category the pre-2022 hard cutoff exists for, and at 2025 it clears that cutoff.